Indulge me a
second. This one hurts.
Maybe it’s the tragedy
that’s already surrounding us in Eastern Europe.
Maybe it’s the
sight of floodwaters in place of where my high school used to be in Northern
NSW.
Maybe it’s the
second person of significance in my life to have died in Thailand.
Maybe it’s the
second cricketer who I’ve never met but felt deeply affected by their death.
Maybe it’s just
all of this. Wrapped into one.
Nothing sobers you
up faster than bad news. There’s an ironic dichotomy of when news filtered
through that Shane Keith Warne had died at around 1.00am on Saturday morning on
Australia’s east coast.
Most of us were
‘on the lash’. Earlier in the evening most of us had raised a glass to the
death of Rodney Marsh…nothing prepared us for what came next.
“And he’s done him.” – Manchester, 1993
Put simply, he is
the best to have played the game of cricket.
And there will
never be anyone better than him because we’ll never see anyone like him ever
again.
There are those
who have more wickets, more runs, more matches and captained their country in
Test cricket. Statistics don’t lie because statistics are measurable and
objective.
But you can’t
measure impact.
You can’t measure
the ability to change a game.
You can’t measure how
watchable someone was, or how captivated you felt as they did their thing.
And you can’t
measure legacy.
There’s an
interesting psychology into how a hero develops in a child’s eyes.
You could study
pages of journals of what defines a hero, and there’s probably very few
characteristics that align with Shane Warne – cricketer or person.
Deep down, heroes
are quite often the ones you want to emulate. They make you proud, because they
make you want to make other people feel proud of you.
Some heroes are
personal. But in the cases of sporting athletes, indirectly, they have a
relationship with many more people than just yourself. The reason so many are
then affected by the tragedy of their death, is that in this instance, everyone
had a relationship with Shane Warne.
There have been
athletes who have come and gone and been so representative of their peoples,
their cultures, and their countries, that they transcend just their skill set.
Like Maradona to
Argentina. Like Kobe Bryant to Los Angeles. So loved was he, universally, that
Shane Warne was just so ‘Australia’.
“A great moment in his career.” – Melbourne,
1994
So many of us
Gen-Y types who grew up loving cricket will almost certainly admit to that one
Christmas where ‘The Shane Warne Ball’ was unwrapped from beneath the Christmas
tree.
The yellow ball
with the red dots and an instruction manual of where to place your fingers and
grip to emulate the various balls Warne had perfected on the international
scene.
This is how to
hold the leg-break. The slider. The zooter. The flipper. The wrong ‘un. The
top-spinner.
We all tried to do
what he did. And none of us were able to. None of us will ever be able to.
I so badly wanted
to be him that, aged six, I demanded my parents legally change my name and
ordered people around me to start calling me Shane. Probably fortunately, it didn’t catch on.
Possibly more than
any other player of that generation – the likes of Ponting, Gilchrist and
McGrath – he was the safety net of heroism, team success and just straight-up
individual brilliance.
Would we all have
loved cricket if it were not for Shane Warne?
Of course, there
were layers. There was the pride. How he’d always lift and we’d always beat
England, and win World Cups and mesmerise us with the mystery and magic that
was leg-spin bowling.
And then there was
the larrikinism. So progressive are we nowadays, it might be more termed
‘arrogance’. There was the sledging, the pre-series predictions, the Rockstar
lifestyle, the on-field showmanship and the cheekiness behind all of it.
Mostly, it was all
just representative of why we love cricket: it was fun.
“This game is coming alive.” – Birmingham,
1999
“Warnie’s on!”
It was a
connection of the triangle between myself, my father Bob and our love of
cricket, which he had been fostered in me at an early age, largely because of
what Warne brought to our cricket experience.
Those two words
were either bellowed out if one of us wasn’t in the lounge room watching the
cricket, which drew a response of Usain Bolt-like speeds to return to the couch.
If we were both in
the room, it drew the response of sitting up either straighter or leaning
forward on the couch, intent on not missing the show.
Watching him was
just theatre.
In his
documentary, released a mere few weeks ago, he would admit that his art could
be defined as such.
It wasn’t so much
the skill execution; he would intimidate.
He’d move a
fielder one metre, bowl the ball for no consequence, and then move the fielder
back to their original place before the very next delivery. It would be for no
reason at all other than to fascinate the umpire, the batter, his own
teammates, the attending crowd, and TV audience that there was some sort of
scheme in development.
For the catalogue of
Warne highlights, three stand out: the 1999 World Cup semi-final, his entire
2005 Ashes series and his Day 5 performance at Adelaide in 2006.
They were moments
where at the time of their happening, you felt all the emotions and energy of when
your team succeeds.
In some cases, 20
years later, YouTube provides an endless supply of highlights to re-watch and
to re-feel all the feelings of euphoria you felt back then.
My own YouTube
algorithm has understood me very well following the hours I’ve spent on the
website, from around 2.00am on Saturday morning, when I first typed in “shane
warne highlights”.
“Bowled him! How about that!” – Birmingham,
2005
I’ve never been
particularly massive on the phrase: ‘Never ever meet your heroes’, largely
because it identifies that it’s the hero, and not yourself, that lets down the
experience.
It’s as if we hold
the hero up to the impossible standard that they have been so excellent in all of
their endeavours, that their chance and fleeting interaction with you also
needs to meet some level of expectancy. And that anything below being treated
like the royal-est royal whoever did live would be a let-down.
Most often, we get
so tongue-tied or nervous that it dents the interaction.
In Warne’s case, I
never met him. Not that I ever sought him out, but there was a sense of
trepidation that anything that I did say to him would be meaningless because
there’s so many other things that I could’ve said in that one moment.
A few weeks ago, I
was unbelievably fortunate to sit down with Ricky Ponting for a six-minute chat
to talk about his MCG experience.
As he spoke, I did
lose myself momentarily in the trance of ‘Punter’, my own childhood and the
fact that his poster was on my wall until the age of 14 and that it embodied
everything I wanted to be as a cricketer and a leader of men.
Then the chat was
over and I was left with a lot of things unsaid that selfishly I just wish I’d
said. Just so Rick had known. Like: “thank you”.
What do you say to
someone who gave you so much of what you loved?
In Warne’s case, I
agree with The Grade Cricketer’s Sam Perry who spoke on this subject in very
raw terms on a special podcast recorded on Saturday evening: Warnie also needed
the love thrown back his way.
Sure, that search
for affection adjoined the ridiculous, the callous, the absurd and the general
head-in-hands reaction.
But it was part of
the man and part of his realism. As ‘Pez’ said, he needed the love, and we were
both encouraged and happy to give it.
“What a cricketer. What a match-winner.
What a ball.” – Adelaide, 2006
Over the last 48
hours, we have well and truly moved into tribute phase.
We like to think
that, individually, Shane Warne meant the most to us, largely because he was so
generous and giving of himself as a cricketer and a person, that we all feel we
have a slice of the pie of Warne to take away with us.
Indeed, my
relationship to Warnie felt personal because he was my first-ever memory of cricket.
But ultimately,
there are friends who are in true guttural mourning of their mate who won’t be
around to share that next laugh, and a family that is still mulling over the
question of ‘why’. Why their son, why their brother and why their father.
That’s where my
head and heart is at.
This tribute is in
response to Shane Warne the cricketer – it is the start and end-point as I did
not know him personally – and the idol that he once was, although it’s a status
that probably never truly left me.
As has been passed
around – he was most definitely flawed.
But the flaws
probably endeared us even more.
The worldly, mixed
with the outer-worldly.
And fuck he was
good at cricket.
“And they can’t catch him!” – Melbourne,
2006
All in all, many
other people and friends have probably summed the affect Shane Keith Warne’s
death has had on them in much more succinct terms than I.
On the Australian
side, friend Dan Toomey posted of Warne: “Thank you. You changed my life.”
On the English
side. Yes, the English side, one friend, Charlie Thomson told me: “He was
cricket.”
Another Pom and
friend, Tom Meredith called Warne: “My sporting hero.”
But back in Oz,
Ian Higgins of the Grade Cricketer summed it up perfectly: “I just hope he knew
how much he meant to us.”
I don’t really
know why this has affected me. ‘Celebrities’ and ‘heroes’ and death might not
register on the emotional scale and nearly every other time – with the
exception of Robin Williams – for me, it has not.
But…
Maybe it’s that
with Shane Warne dying, the private lie that you might be still in connection
with your childhood has died alongside with it.
Maybe it’s a level
of guilt that you were waiting for the most mature time to thank your ‘hero’
for everything that they gave to you, but time ran out.
Maybe it’s just
that it couldn’t have been him. Not now. Not at this time.
Maybe it’s just
all of this. Wrapped into one.
And maybe, it’s
just another reminder to tell your friends you love them.
Rest well, Warnie.